Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.futminna.edu.ng:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/7328
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOkoro, Uzoma G.-
dc.contributor.authorAdedipe, Oyewole-
dc.contributor.authorLawal, Sunday A.-
dc.contributor.authorDiugwu, Ikechukwu A.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-08T10:09:13Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-08T10:09:13Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.issn2579-0625 (Online)-
dc.identifier.issn2579-0617 (Paper)-
dc.identifier.otherhttp://dx.doi.org/10.46792/fuoyejet.v5i1.463-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.futminna.edu.ng:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/7328-
dc.descriptionFUOYE Journal of Engineering and Technology (FUOYEJET), Volume 5, Issue 1, 72-77en_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper proposes a structure for maintenance decision support suitable for application to renewable energy assets. The method combines subjective tacit knowledge of subject-area experts with well-structured Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) to elicit weights of criteria relevant for effects evaluation of possible failures modes towards support for componentโ€™s maintenance decisions. The Technique for Ordered Preference using Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) algorithm is adopted for aggregating the evaluation scores and achieving priority indexing given the conflicting characteristics of some criteria. Part of the highlights of the Framework is the implementation of the group experts, as well as individual expert's elicitations in a complimentary manner that eliminates subjective opinions and achieves a repeatable evaluation score. The conclusion of the analysis is the prioritisation of the componentโ€™s failure; An indicative case study of offshore wind turbine jacket support structure is used to demonstrate the applicability of the approach and the analysis results -which shows priority failure modes for focused maintenance intervention as bending of Chord/Brace (๐‘ƒ๐ผ = 0.65), collapse of Chord/Brace (๐‘ƒ๐ผ = 0.49), buckling of Long piles (๐‘ƒ๐ผ = 0.46), and Truss(๐‘ƒ๐ผ = 0.45), overturning of Skirt pile (๐‘ƒ๐ผ = 0.45), and fatigue of Long pile (๐‘ƒ๐ผ = 0.45), further demonstrates the capacity of the model to support maintenance decisions. Caution is exercised in the selection of criteria that would capture the objectives of the risk analyses by consulting wide range of industry expertsen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFaculty of Engineering, Federal University Oye-Ekitien_US
dc.subjectAHPen_US
dc.subjectExperten_US
dc.subjectOffshore energyen_US
dc.subjectTOPSISen_US
dc.subjectWind turbine Support Structureen_US
dc.titleA Framework for Sustainable Maintenance of Offshore Energy Structuresen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Project management Technology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FUOYE Jounal.pdfA Framework for Sustainable Maintenance of Offshore Energy Structures754.75 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.