Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.futminna.edu.ng:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/3189
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHassan Ibrahim Ogiri-
dc.contributor.authorOgunbode, E. B.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T10:47:53Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-15T10:47:53Z-
dc.date.issued2008-04-
dc.identifier.citationHassan I. O, Ogunbode E. B (2008).Comparative Assessment of equipment in the Nigerian construction industry. Environmental Technology & science journal (ETSJ), Vol. 3, No. 1 Pp 53-58en_US
dc.identifier.issn2006-0459-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.futminna.edu.ng:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/3189-
dc.description.abstractThis paper focused on comparative assessment of hiring and purchasing construction plants with regards to their cost and benefits and it also carried out an overview of the selection criteria for construction equipment with a view to identifying the method that is more appropriate and better for plant management approach. A review of relevant literature was made in conjunction with questionnaire and oral interviews with plant supervisors, site managers, construction consultants, professionals in the construction industry and stake holders in equipment hiring/leasing firms. In the study, Lack of capital outlay for equipment purchase, lack of well organised hiring firms, high cot spare parts, lack of proper planning vis a vis equipment record keeping were identified to be the major problems facing the construction industry. Furthermore, results also showed that it is more economical to own than to hire equipment, depending on the frequency utilization of equipment.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSchool of Environmental Technology (SET), Federal University of Technology Minnaen_US
dc.subjectConstruction Equipment; procurement Methods; plant; Construction Industry; Cost.en_US
dc.titleComparative Assessment of Construction plant Procurement Methods in Minna and Jos Metropolisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Building

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Comparative Assessment of Cons.pdfJournal Article6.74 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.