Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.futminna.edu.ng:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/26975
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAbifarin, Modupe O.-
dc.contributor.authorIsah, Audu-
dc.contributor.authorYakubu, Yisa-
dc.contributor.authorAdeyemi, R. A.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-19T16:24:31Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-19T16:24:31Z-
dc.date.issued2024-02-01-
dc.identifier.citationAbifarin et al.; Asian J. Prob. Stat., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 50-63, 2024; Article no.AJPAS.112368en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.futminna.edu.ng:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/26975-
dc.descriptionError Correction lag model in Financial econometricsen_US
dc.description.abstractIn the presence of explosiveness of the adjustment term in the error correction model, the adjustment of the dependent variable Y was too large and overshoots the equilibrium, creating a divergent pattern. The error correction model fails to capture the deviation from equilibrium appropriately, thereby resulting in overshooting of the model. In this paper, a new model to stabilize the explosiveness in an Error Correction model called the stabilizing Error Correction Mechanism was proposed. Mathematical methodology for obtaining the estimate of the model using the Ordinal Least Square method was derived. Error Correction model was used to model the relationship among the variables and the result was compared with the Stabilizing Error Correction Mechanism using root mean square error. A Monte-Carlo simulation was performed, and the stimulation results showed that the error correction model exhibited some explosiveness, and the damping coefficient of the stabilizing model exerted a stabilizing effect on the error correction mechanism, thereby reducing the overshooting in the error correction model. The proposed model contributed to a smoother and more stable response to deviations from the long-run equilibrium. The root mean square error of the stabilizing Error Correction model was observed to be 1.30663, 1.04533, 12.55786, 10.49876, 10.0034, and 19.41545 as compared to the adjustment model in the Error Correction model (60.6888, 35.5929, 315238, 24.31958, 10.1485 and 19.7687) when the persistence is high and (𝜷𝟎,𝜷𝟏,0)=(𝟏,𝟎,𝟎). Therefore, the Stabilizing Error Correction model performs better than the Error Correction model.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSelf fundeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAsian Journal of Probability and Statisticsen_US
dc.subjectAutoregressive distributed lagen_US
dc.subjecterror correction modelen_US
dc.titleStabilizing Error Correction Mechanism in the Presence of Explosivenessen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Statistics

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Abifarin 2024 AJPAS112368.pdfErrror Correction modelling in financial econometrics512.9 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.