Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.futminna.edu.ng:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/2654
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAnifowose, Opeyemi Maroof-
dc.contributor.authorIlias, Said-
dc.contributor.authorRadzi, Ismail-
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-11T01:04:14Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-11T01:04:14Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationAnifowose, O. M., Said, I., & Ismail, R (2016) Factors affecting building security cost sustainability using PCA. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, Vol. 21, No.1, Pp 21-38.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1366-4387-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.futminna.edu.ng:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/2654-
dc.description.abstractPurpose – The purpose of this study is to evaluate built environment experts’ perception of factors affecting the building security cost for sustainable development. It examines the effects of building characteristics and protective measures on the cost of building security within the built environment. Design/methodology/approach – The study uses a quantitative research technique, using questionnaires to source relevant information from respondents. Of the 333 questionnaires administered, 293 usable responses were returned, giving an 88 per cent response rate. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is used to examine the suitability of these data for factor analysis. Principal component analysis (PCA) is used to extract the factors. Findings – Components 1, 2 and 3 reflect concern for procurement of security devices, design process of security requirements and safety of life and property and fear of crime, respectively. The communalities represented by R2 are relatively strong across the variables. Aesthetics is significant with an R2 value of 0.71, which shows that this factor should be given due consideration when procuring building security devices. Also, height, location and use of building are significant with R2 values of 0.70, 0.63 and 0.71, respectively. These factors positively influence the building security cost and should be given due consideration when designing protective buildings. Practical implications – The findings would assist in the evaluation, planning and control of the rising cost of building security. Social implications – This study serves to sensitize built environment experts, criminologists and policymakers of the design implication of protective requirements of building security. Originality/value – This study provides empirical evidence that the various factors considered have an effect on the building security cost and contribute immensely towards sustainable the building security cost within the built environment.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJournal of Financial Management of Property and Constructionen_US
dc.subjectBuilt environmenten_US
dc.subjectPrincipal component analysisen_US
dc.subjectCrime preventionen_US
dc.subjectBuilding security costen_US
dc.subjectBurglaryen_US
dc.subjectSustainability assessmenten_US
dc.titleFactors affecting building security cost sustainability using PCAen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Quantity Surveying

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
JFMPC-08-2015-0032 Published.pdfResearch Paper226.48 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.