Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.futminna.edu.ng:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/14749
Title: Comparative Effects of Two Modes of Computer-Assisted Instructional Packages on Solid Geometry Achievement.
Authors: Gambari, A I
Ezenwa, V I
Anyanwu, R C
Keywords: Computer-assisted instruction; Multimedia-based learning; Animation+Narration; Animation+On-screen text;
Solid geometry; Secondary students
Issue Date: 2014
Publisher: Contemporary Educational Technology
Citation: Gambari, A. I., Ezenwa, V. I., & Anyanwu, R. C. (2014). Comparative Effects of Two Modes of Computer-Assisted Instructional Packages on Solid Geometry Achievement. Contemporary Educational Technology, 5(2), 110 - 120. A Publication of Anadolu University, Turkey. Available online at http://cedtech.net
Series/Report no.: 5(2);110-120
Abstract: The study examined the effects of two modes of computer-assisted instructional package on solid geometry achievement amongst senior secondary school students in Minna, Niger State, Nigeria. Also, the influence of gender on the performance of students exposed to CAI(AT) and CAI(AN) packages were examined. This study adopted a pretest-posttest experimental design with 3 x 2 factorial design and a sample of 120 Senior Secondary class Two (SSII) students (60 male and 60 female). Computer-Assisted Instructional package of two modes; Animation with Text (AT), and Animation with Narration (AN) were employed as treatment instruments and a Solid Geometry Achievement Test (SGAT) was used as test instrument. A trial test was carried out and a reliability co-efficient of 0.78 was obtained using the KR-21. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and t-test was used in analysing data collected. The study revealed that, there were significant differences in the post-test mean scores of CAI(AT), CAI(AN) and the control group (F = 11.468, df = 119, p<0.05) and the Scheffe’s post-hoc test revealed a significant difference between CAI(AN) and the lecture method groups, favoring CAI(AN), there was no statistically significant difference in the post-test mean scores of male and female students taught using CAI(AT) (t=0,660,df=38, p>0.05) and CAI(AN) (t=1.455, df = 38, p>0.05). Based on these findings, it was therefore recommended that mathematics teachers should be encouraged to use CAI(AN) for meaningful and effective teaching and learning of mathematics.
URI: http://repository.futminna.edu.ng:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/14749
Appears in Collections:Educational Technology



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.