Haruna D. MusaMohd R. YacobAhmad M. AbdullahMohd Y Ishak2025-05-032021Musa, H.D., Yacob, M.R., Abdullah, A.M. and Ishak, M.Y. (2020) ‘Urban sustainability and gross national happiness: a review of community well-being domains and dimensions’, Int. J. Innovation and Sustainable Development, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp.157–184.https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISD.2020.106228http://repository.futminna.edu.ng:4000/handle/123456789/1683The effort in measuring well-being and happiness by plethora of different indicators and frameworks are stepping up globally, despite critics for not being accepted as the national indicator to promote subjective well-being due to the methodological approach and choices of dimensions employed. This study, reviews current research on community well-being measurement to justify the inclusion of different sustainability metrics to optimise outcomes for national happiness and urban sustainability. Forty-four (44) scientific articles were identified, out of 300 research studies drawn from the electronic data search from the world of science focusing on key dimensions: economic, social, environment, governance, politics, culture, and health. Finding shows that social dimension and objective approach remains the most studied on community well-being with few studies on subjective domain. Finding suggests that a multidisciplinary conceptual framework towards a holistic view is desirable to allow for a more theory-based tool to evaluate multidimensional issues of community well-being at all levels.encommunity assessmenturban dimensionssubjective well-beingsustainable development.Article