Comparative evaluation of the performance of a capacitive and a non-capacitive microbial fuel cell

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2021-03-25

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

IEEE

Abstract

Electrode materials play a critical role in the performance of microbial fuel cells. This study investigates the contribution of capacitive bio-electrodes to sustainable power production in a single-chamber microbial fuel cell (MFC). The capacitive electrodes consisted of a stainless-steel wire mesh with an activated carbon layer, while the non-capacitive control electrodes were made of graphite felt with a wound current collector. The MFCs were constructed using a glass vessel with the anode completely buried in biologically active soil and the cathode placed above the soil to form a single-chamber configuration. The performance of the MFCs was investigated using linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The results showed that the performance of the capacitive MFC was three times better than that of the non-capacitive MFC. While there was no significant difference in the Ohmic resistances of the MFCs, there was a significant difference in charge transfer resistance and capacitance of the MFCs. The capacitive MFC had a double layer capacitance of 8.282 µF in addition to the diffuse layer capacitance at the layer/metal interface of 2.012 F, while the non-capacitive MFC had a double layer capacitance of 5.034 µF with no diffuse layer capacitance. The results show that the capacitive characteristics of both cathode and anode improve the performance of a single-chamber MFC.

Description

Keywords

capacitive MFC, electrodes, power, resistance, microbial fuel cell

Citation

Simeon Meshack Imologie, A. L. Imoize and R. Freitag, Comparative evaluation of the performance of a capacitive and a non-capacitive microbial fuel cell, 2021 18th IEEE International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals & Devices (SSD), 22-25 March 2021. Monastir, Tunisia. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/SSD52085.2021.9429481.

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By