School of Infrastructure Process Engineering and Technology (SIPET)

Permanent URI for this communityhttp://197.211.34.35:4000/handle/123456789/27

School of Infrastructure Process Engineering and Technology (SIPET)

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Item
    Analysis of Statically Determinate Trusses using Exact Method (Joint Resolution Method) and Matrix Stiffness Method
    (USEP: Journal of Research Information in Civil Engineering, 2017-10-10) A. Abdullah; I. T. Yusuf; M. Abubakar; H. O. Aminulai; YUSUF, Abdulazeez; B. Alhaji
    Matrix Stiffness Method (MSM) as a tool for static analysis of structures is premised on the principle of Finite Element Method (FEM), which in itself is a numerical/approximate method capable of giving only approximate results. However, Joint Resolution Method (JRM) is one of the most popular classical/exact methods of static analysis capable of giving exact results. This paper presents an analysis of a statically determinate 2-D truss using Exact/Joint Resolution Method (JRM) and Matric Stiffness Method (MSM) to ascertain the validity of the latter against the former. In the JRM, the support reactions and internal member forces were obtained from considerations of the equilibrium conditions of the entire truss and isolated joints respectively. On the other hand, a computer program was written in MATLAB 7.8.0 (R2009a) based on the principles of MSM for ease of computation and increased accuracy to solve for member forces and reactions of the same truss. The element properties were obtained and employed to calculate the element stiffness matrices, these were then assembled into the global stiffness matrix, from which the unknown displacements, member forces and support reactions were calculated. The results obtained from using both JRM and MSM were found to be exactly the same or very close, with percentage errors ranging between 0% and 3%. Hence MSM results as compared to JRM have 97% accuracy and above, and can therefore be relied upon.
  • Item
    Computer-aided analysis of reinforced concrete waffle bridge deck using the method of grillages
    (International Civil Engineering Conference (2018) (ICEC2018)., 2018) Adamu, H. N.; Sadiku, S.; Bala Alhaji
    This paper aims to analyse a reinforced concrete waffle bridge deck using method of grillages where the topping and ribs are analysed as a monolithic unit in contrast to the conventional methods where the slab and beams are analyzed differently. In addition, the grillage approach accounts for the torsion that is usually lost in the conventional approach. The slab loading is in line with the HA loading of the BS 5400 part 2 for lightly loaded (accommodation) bridges. One of the strength of this approach is that it is amenable to computer application which has been demonstrated by using a code written in Matrix Laboratory (MATLAB) software and therefore easy for field use by practitioners. For the purpose of rendering this approach amenable to computer application, a program was used to determine the displacements, bending moments and torsional moments in the bridge deck. It is observed that the values of bending moments obtained from grillage analysis are lower than the moments from conventional beam-slab analysis carried out manually. Bending moments and other responses generated by conventional beam-slab approaches are usually exaggerated thereby reducing the anticipated benefits of waffle slab.
  • Item
    Analysis of Statically Determinate Trusses using Exact Method (Joint Resolution Method) and Matrix Stiffness Method
    (USEP: Journal of Research Information in Civil Engineering, 2017) Abdullahi, A.; Yusuf, I. T.; Abubakar, Mahmud; Aminulai, H. O.; Yusuf, A.; Alhaji, B.
    Matrix Stiffness Method (MSM) as a tool for static analysis of structures is premised on the principle of Finite Element Method (FEM), which in itself is a numerical/approximate method capable of giving only approximate results. However, Joint Resolution Method (JRM) is one of the most popular classical/exact methods of static analysis capable of giving exact results. This paper presents an analysis of a statically determinate 2-D truss using Exact/Joint Resolution Method (JRM) and Matric Stiffness Method (MSM) to ascertain the validity of the latter against the former. In the JRM, the support reactions and internal member forces were obtained from considerations of the equilibrium conditions of the entire truss and isolated joints respectively. On the other hand, a computer program was written in MATLAB 7.8.0 (R2009a) based on the principles of MSM for ease of computation and increased accuracy to solve for member forces and reactions of the same truss. The element properties were obtained and employed to calculate the element stiffness matrices, these were then assembled into the global stiffness matrix, from which the unknown displacements, member forces and support reactions were calculated. The results obtained from using both JRM and MSM were found to be exactly the same or very close, with percentage errors ranging between 0% and 3%. Hence MSM results as compared to JRM have 97% accuracy and above, and can therefore be relied upon.
  • Item
    A Comparative Analysis of Grillage Method and Beam line Analysis of a Reinforced Concrete Waffle Brifge Deck
    (Nigeria Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences (NJEAS), 2022-01-23) Adamu, H. N.; Abbas, B. A.; Abubakar, M.; Yusuf, A.; Kolo, D. N.; Shehu, M.
    The analysis of reinforced concrete waffle bridge deck using Chanchaga bridge as a case study was carried out with the aid of computer program written in MATLAB. The bridge deck which is a beam bridge was idealized to be a waffle slab. A mathematical model of the bridge was developed using the method of grillages because very complex shapes of problem domain with prescribed conditions can be handled easily using the method. The bridge deck was modelled as interconnection of grid elements. The analysis was carried out using direct stiffness matrix method. The nodal displacements and the resulting static internal forces; shear forces, bending moments and twisting moments of each grid element were determined using the matrix. The results obtained using the method of grillages were then compared with beam line analysis and the former method gave a 10% decrease in forces which will result in the reduction of overall design and materials by 10%.